banner



Home  ›  What Animals Live In The Kelp Forest

What Animals Live In The Kelp Forest

Written By Thursday, May 5, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Underwater areas with a high density of kelp

Kelp forests are underwater areas with a loftier density of kelp, which covers a large office of the world'southward coastlines. Smaller areas of anchored kelp are chosen kelp beds. They are recognized as one of the about productive and dynamic ecosystems on Earth.[1] Although algal kelp woods combined with coral reefs simply cover 0.i% of Globe'due south total surface, they account for 0.9% of global master productivity.[2] Kelp forests occur worldwide throughout temperate and polar coastal oceans.[1] In 2007, kelp forests were also discovered in tropical waters well-nigh Republic of ecuador.[3]

Global distribution of kelp forests

"I can only compare these great aquatic forests...with the terrestrial ones in the intertropical regions. Yet if in any country a forest was destroyed, I do not believe so nearly so many species of animals would perish equally would here, from the destruction of kelp. Among the leaves of this found numerous species of fish alive, which nowhere else could find food or shelter; with their destruction the many cormorants and other line-fishing birds, the otters, seals and porpoise, would before long perish also; and lastly, the Fuegian[s]...would...decrease in numbers and perhaps cease to exist.

– Charles Darwin, 1 June 1834, Tierra del Fuego, Chile[four]

Physically formed by brown macroalgae, kelp forests provide a unique habitat for marine organisms[5] and are a source for understanding many ecological processes. Over the last century, they take been the focus of extensive enquiry, peculiarly in trophic ecology, and keep to provoke important ideas that are relevant beyond this unique ecosystem. For case, kelp forests tin can influence coastal oceanographic patterns[6] and provide many ecosystem services.[7]

However, the influence of humans has oft contributed to kelp forest deposition. Of particular concern are the effects of overfishing nearshore ecosystems, which can release herbivores from their normal population regulation and result in the overgrazing of kelp and other algae.[eight] This can rapidly upshot in transitions to barren landscapes where relatively few species persist.[ix] [10] Already due to the combined effects of overfishing and climate change, kelp forests take all but disappeared in many especially vulnerable places, such as Tasmania's east coast and the coast of Northern California.[xi] [12] The implementation of marine protected areas is one management strategy useful for addressing such issues, since it may limit the impacts of line-fishing and buffer the ecosystem from additive effects of other environmental stressors.

Kelp [edit]

Primary article: Kelp

The term kelp refers to marine algae belonging to the order Laminariales (phylum: Ochrophyta). Though not considered a taxonomically various order, kelps are highly diverse structurally and functionally.[seven] The virtually widely recognized species are the giant kelps (Macrocystis spp.), although numerous other genera such as Laminaria, Ecklonia, Lessonia, Nereocystis, Alaria, and Eisenia are described.

A broad range of sea life uses kelp forests for protection or nutrient, including fish. In the North Pacific kelp forests, especially rockfish, and many invertebrates, such as amphipods, shrimp, marine snails, bristle worms, and brittle stars. Many marine mammals and birds are also found, including seals, sea lions, whales, sea otters, gulls, terns, snowy egrets, great blue herons, and cormorants, too as some shore birds.[xiii]

Frequently considered an ecosystem engineer, kelp provides a physical substrate and habitat for kelp forest communities.[14] In algae (kingdom Protista), the body of an individual organism is known every bit a thallus rather than every bit a plant (kingdom Plantae). The morphological structure of a kelp thallus is defined by 3 basic structural units:[9]

  • The holdfast is a root-like mass that anchors the thallus to the sea floor, though dissimilar truthful roots information technology is not responsible for absorbing and delivering nutrients to the rest of the thallus.
  • The stipe is analogous to a plant stem, extending vertically from the holdfast and providing a support framework for other morphological features.
  • The fronds are leaf- or bract-like attachments extending from the stipe, sometimes forth its full length, and are the sites of food uptake and photosynthetic action.

In addition, many kelp species have pneumatocysts, or gas-filled bladders, unremarkably located at the base of fronds nigh the stipe. These structures provide the necessary buoyancy for kelp to maintain an upright position in the water column.

The environmental factors necessary for kelp to survive include hard substrate (usually rock or sand), high nutrients (e.thou., nitrogen, phosphorus), and light (minimum annual irradiance dose > 50 E m−2 [15]). Peculiarly productive kelp forests tend to exist associated with areas of significant oceanographic upwelling, a procedure that delivers cool, nutrient-rich water from depth to the ocean'southward mixed surface layer.[xv] Water period and turbulence facilitate food assimilation across kelp fronds throughout the water column.[sixteen] H2o clarity affects the depth to which sufficient light tin can be transmitted. In ideal conditions, behemothic kelp (Macrocystis spp.) can grow as much as 30–60 cm vertically per 24-hour interval. Some species, such every bit Nereocystis, are annuals, while others such as Eisenia are perennials, living for more than 20 years.[17] In perennial kelp forests, maximum growth rates occur during upwelling months (typically leap and summer) and die-backs correspond to reduced nutrient availability, shorter photoperiods, and increased storm frequency.[9]

Kelps are primarily associated with temperate and arctic waters worldwide. Of the more dominant genera, Laminaria is mainly associated with both sides of the Atlantic Ocean and the coasts of Red china and Japan; Ecklonia is found in Commonwealth of australia, New Zealand, and South Africa; and Macrocystis occurs throughout the northeastern and southeastern Pacific Ocean, Southern Body of water archipelagos, and in patches effectually Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa.[9] The region with the greatest diversity of kelps (>20 species) is the northeastern Pacific, from north of San Francisco, California, to the Aleutian Islands, Alaska.

Although kelp forests are unknown in tropical surface waters, a few species of Laminaria accept been known to occur exclusively in tropical deep waters.[18] [19] This general absence of kelp from the tropics is believed to exist mostly due to bereft nutrient levels associated with warm, oligotrophic waters.[9] One recent written report spatially overlaid the requisite concrete parameters for kelp with hateful oceanographic conditions has produced a model predicting the existence of subsurface kelps throughout the tropics worldwide to depths of 200 yard (660 ft). For a hotspot in the Galapagos Islands, the local model was improved with fine-calibration data and tested; the enquiry team found thriving kelp forests in all eight of their sampled sites, all of which had been predicted past the model, thus validated their approach. This suggests that their global model might actually be fairly accurate, and if then, kelp forests would be prolific in tropical subsurface waters worldwide.[iii] The importance of this contribution has been speedily best-selling inside the scientific community and has prompted an entirely new trajectory of kelp forest inquiry, specially emphasizing the potential for a spatial refuge from climate alter too the explanations to evolutionary patterns of kelps worldwide.[20]

Ecosystem architecture [edit]

A diver in a kelp forest off the declension of California

A kelp forest off of the coast of Anacapa Isle, California

Giant kelp uses gas-filled floats to keep the plant suspended, allowing the kelp blades well-nigh the ocean surface to capture light for photosynthesis.

The architecture of a kelp woods ecosystem is based on its physical structure, which influences the associated species that ascertain its community construction. Structurally, the ecosystem includes three guilds of kelp and two guilds occupied by other algae:[9]

  • Canopy kelps include the largest species and often constitute floating canopies that extend to the ocean surface (e.k., Macrocystis and Alaria).
  • Stipitate kelps mostly extend a few meters to a higher place the bounding main floor and can grow in dense aggregations (due east.g., Eisenia and Ecklonia).
  • Prostrate kelps prevarication well-nigh and forth the sea flooring (e.thou., Laminaria).
  • The benthic assemblage is composed of other algal species (eastward.grand., filamentous and foliose functional groups, articulated corallines) and sessile organisms along the sea bottom.
  • Encrusting coralline algae direct and often extensively comprehend geologic substrate.

Multiple kelp species frequently co-exist inside a forest; the term understory canopy refers to the stipitate and prostrate kelps. For example, a Macrocystis canopy may extend many meters higher up the seafloor towards the ocean surface, while an understory of the kelps Eisenia and Pterygophora reaches upward merely a few meters. Below these kelps, a benthic assemblage of foliose red algae may occur. The dumbo vertical infrastructure with overlying canopy forms a system of microenvironments similar to those observed in a terrestrial forest, with a sunny awning region, a partially shaded heart, and darkened seafloor.[9] Each guild has associated organisms, which vary in their levels of dependence on the habitat, and the assemblage of these organisms can vary with kelp morphologies.[21] [22] [23] For example, in California, Macrocystis pyrifera forests, the nudibranch Melibe leonina, and skeleton shrimp Caprella californica are closely associated with surface canopies; the kelp perch Brachyistius frenatus, rockfish Sebastes spp., and many other fishes are found within the stipitate understory; breakable stars and turban snails Tegula spp. are closely associated with the kelp holdfast, while various herbivores, such as bounding main urchins and abalone, live under the prostrate canopy; many seastars, hydroids, and benthic fishes live amongst the benthic assemblages; lone corals, various gastropods, and echinoderms live over the encrusting coralline algae.[21] In addition, pelagic fishes and marine mammals are loosely associated with kelp forests, usually interacting near the edges as they visit to feed on resident organisms.

Trophic environmental [edit]

Classic studies in kelp forest ecology take largely focused on trophic interactions (the relationships between organisms and their food webs), particularly the understanding and top-downwardly trophic processes. Bottom-up processes are mostly driven by the abiotic conditions required for primary producers to abound, such as availability of light and nutrients, and the subsequent transfer of free energy to consumers at college trophic levels. For case, the occurrence of kelp is frequently correlated with oceanographic upwelling zones, which provide unusually high concentrations of nutrients to the local environment.[24] [25] This allows kelp to grow and subsequently back up herbivores, which in turn support consumers at higher trophic levels.[26] By contrast, in top-down processes, predators limit the biomass of species at lower trophic levels through consumption. In the absence of predation, these lower-level species flourish because resource that back up their energetic requirements are non limiting. In a well-studied instance from Alaskan kelp forests,[27] sea otters (Enhydra lutris) command populations of herbivorous sea urchins through predation. When sea otters are removed from the ecosystem (for case, by homo exploitation), urchin populations are released from predatory control and grow dramatically. This leads to increased herbivore pressure on local kelp stands. Deterioration of the kelp itself results in the loss of physical ecosystem construction and subsequently, the loss of other species associated with this habitat. In Alaskan kelp woods ecosystems, ocean otters are the keystone species that mediates this trophic cascade. In Southern California, kelp forests persist without bounding main otters and the control of herbivorous urchins is instead mediated by a suite of predators including lobsters and large fishes, such as the California sheephead. The effect of removing 1 predatory species in this arrangement differs from Alaska because redundancy exists in the trophic levels and other predatory species can proceed to regulate urchins.[22] However, the removal of multiple predators can finer release urchins from predator force per unit area and allow the arrangement to follow trajectories towards kelp woods degradation.[28] Similar examples be in Nova Scotia,[29] South Africa,[30] Commonwealth of australia,[31] and Chile.[32] The relative importance of top-down versus bottom-upwards control in kelp woods ecosystems and the strengths of trophic interactions continue to be the field of study of considerable scientific investigation.[33] [34] [35]

The transition from macroalgal (i.east. kelp forest) to denuded landscapes dominated past bounding main urchins (or 'urchin barrens') is a widespread phenomenon,[7] [36] [37] [38] oftentimes resulting from trophic cascades like those described in a higher place; the 2 phases are regarded every bit alternative stable states of the ecosystem.[39] [40] The recovery of kelp forests from arid states has been documented following dramatic perturbations, such as urchin disease or big shifts in thermal weather condition.[28] [41] [42] Recovery from intermediate states of deterioration is less predictable and depends on a combination of abiotic factors and biotic interactions in each instance.

Though urchins are usually the dominant herbivores, others with meaning interaction strengths include seastars, isopods, kelp crabs, and herbivorous fishes.[9] [33] In many cases, these organisms feed on kelp that has been dislodged from substrate and drifts near the ocean floor rather than expend energy searching for intact thalli on which to feed. When sufficient drift kelp is available, herbivorous grazers practise not exert pressure on attached plants; when drift subsidies are unavailable, grazers directly bear upon the concrete construction of the ecosystem.[43] [44] Many studies in Southern California have demonstrated that the availability of drift kelp specifically influences the foraging beliefs of body of water urchins.[45] [46] Drift kelp and kelp-derived particulate affair have too been important in subsidizing next habitats, such as sandy beaches and the rocky intertidal.[47] [48] [49]

Patch dynamics [edit]

Another major area of kelp woods research has been directed at understanding the spatial-temporal patterns of kelp patches. Not simply do such dynamics affect the physical landscape, but they also touch species that acquaintance with kelp for refuge or foraging activities.[21] [26] Large-scale environmental disturbances accept offered important insights concerning mechanisms and ecosystem resilience. Examples of environmental disturbances include:

  • Acute and chronic pollution events take been shown to touch on southern California kelp forests, though the intensity of the affect seems to depend on both the nature of the contaminants and elapsing of exposure.[l] [51] [52] [53] [54] Pollution tin include sediment deposition and eutrophication from sewage, industrial byproducts and contaminants like PCBs and heavy metals (for example, copper, zinc), runoff of organophosphates from agricultural areas, anti-fouling chemicals used in harbors and marinas (for example, TBT and creosote) and land-based pathogens like fecal coliform bacteria.
  • Catastrophic storms can remove surface kelp canopies through wave activity, merely usually get out understory kelps intact; they tin can also remove urchins when little spatial refuge is available.[39] [44] Interspersed canopy clearings create a seascape mosaic where sunlight penetrates deeper into the kelp forest and species that are normally light-limited in the understory tin flourish. Similarly, substrate cleared of kelp holdfasts tin can provide space for other sessile species to constitute themselves and occupy the seafloor, sometimes straight competing with juvenile kelp and fifty-fifty inhibiting their settlement.[55]
  • El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events involve the depression of oceanographic thermoclines, severe reductions of food input, and changes in storm patterns.[39] [56] Stress due to warm h2o and nutrient depletion can increase the susceptibility of kelp to storm harm and herbivorous grazing, sometimes even prompting stage shifts to urchin-dominated landscapes.[42] [45] [57] In full general, oceanographic weather condition (that is, h2o temperature, currents) influence the recruitment success of kelp and its competitors, which clearly affect subsequent species interactions and kelp forest dynamics.[39] [58]
  • Overfishing college trophic levels that naturally regulate herbivore populations is likewise recognized as an important stressor in kelp forests.[viii] [35] [59] As described in the previous department, the drivers and outcomes of trophic cascades are important for understanding spatial-temporal patterns of kelp forests.[27] [28] [33]

In improver to ecological monitoring of kelp forests earlier, during, and afterwards such disturbances, scientists try to tease autonomously the intricacies of kelp forest dynamics using experimental manipulations. By working on smaller spatial-temporal scales, they can control for the presence or absence of specific biotic and abiotic factors to discover the operative mechanisms. For example, in southern Commonwealth of australia, manipulations of kelp awning types demonstrated that the relative amount of Ecklonia radiata in a canopy could be used to predict understory species assemblages; consequently, the proportion of Eastward. radiata tin be used as an indicator of other species occurring in the environs.[threescore]

Human use [edit]

Kelp forests take been important to human being being for thousands of years.[61] Indeed, many at present theorise that the kickoff colonisation of the Americas was due to fishing communities following the Pacific kelp forests during the last ice age. One theory contends that the kelp forests that would have stretched from northeast Asia to the American Pacific coast would have provided many benefits to aboriginal boaters. The kelp forests would have provided many sustenance opportunities, also as acting as a type of buffer from rough water. Besides these benefits, researchers believe that the kelp forests might have helped early boaters navigate, acting equally a type of "kelp highway". Theorists also advise that the kelp forests would have helped these ancient colonists by providing a stable way of life and preventing them from having to adapt to new ecosystems and develop new survival methods even as they traveled thousands of miles.[62] Modern economies are based on fisheries of kelp-associated species such as lobster and rockfish. Humans tin can also harvest kelp directly to feed aquaculture species such as abalone and to extract the compound alginic acrid, which is used in products like toothpaste and antacids.[63] [64] Kelp forests are valued for recreational activities such as SCUBA diving and kayaking; the industries that support these sports represent one benefit related to the ecosystem and the enjoyment derived from these activities represents some other. All of these are examples of ecosystem services provided specifically past kelp forests.

Threats and management [edit]

The nudibranch Melibe leonina on a Macrocystis frond (California): Marine protected areas are ane way to guard kelp forests equally an ecosystem.

Given the complexity of kelp forests – their variable construction, geography, and interactions – they pose a considerable challenge to ecology managers. Extrapolating even well-studied trends to the hereafter is difficult because interactions within the ecosystem will change under variable conditions, not all relationships in the ecosystem are understood, and the nonlinear thresholds to transitions are non all the same recognized.[65] With respect to kelp forests, major issues of concern include marine pollution and water quality, kelp harvesting and fisheries, invasive species,[seven] and climate change.[66] The most pressing threat to kelp forest preservation may be the overfishing of coastal ecosystems, which by removing college trophic levels facilitates their shift to depauperate urchin barrens.[eight] The maintenance of biodiversity is recognized as a way of more often than not stabilizing ecosystems and their services through mechanisms such equally functional compensation and reduced susceptibility to foreign species invasions.[67] [68] [69] [lxx] More recently, the 2022 IPCC report states that kelp and other seaweeds in near regions are undergoing mass mortalities from high temperature extremes and range shifts from warming, as they are stationary and cannot conform quick plenty to deal with the rapidly increasing temperature of the Earth and thus, the ocean.[71]

In many places, managers have opted to regulate the harvest of kelp[25] [72] and/or the taking of kelp woods species by fisheries.[seven] [59] While these may be constructive in one sense, they do not necessarily protect the entirety of the ecosystem. Marine protected areas (MPAs) offering a unique solution that encompasses not only target species for harvesting, but also the interactions surrounding them and the local environment every bit a whole.[73] [74] Direct benefits of MPAs to fisheries (for instance, spillover effects) accept been well documented around the world.[8] [75] [76] [77] Indirect benefits take also been shown for several cases amid species such equally abalone and fishes in Cardinal California.[78] [79] Most chiefly, MPAs tin can be effective at protecting existing kelp forest ecosystems and may as well let for the regeneration of those that have been affected.[39] [eighty] [81]

Kelp forest restoration in California [edit]

In the 2010s, Northern California lost 95% of its kelp ecosystems due to marine heatwaves.[82] [83] [84] [85]

Kelp bed recovery efforts in California are primarily focusing on sea urchin removal,[86] both by scuba defined,[87] and past sea otters, which are natural predators.[88] [89] [90] [91] [92]

A dark-brown algae, Sargassum horneri, an invasive species first spotted in 2003, has also been a concern.[93] [94]

Researchers at the Bodega Marine Laboratory of UC Davis are developing replanting strategies, and volunteers of the Orange County Coastkeeper group are replanting giant kelp.[95] [96] Humboldt State University began cultivating bull kelp in its research farm in 2021.[97]

Research efforts at the country level to prevent kelp forest collapse in California were announced in July 2020.[98]

At the federal level, H.R. 4458, the Keeping Ecosystems Living and Productive (KELP) Act, introduced July 29, 2021, seeks to establish a new grant program within NOAA for kelp forest restoration.[99]

Encounter also [edit]

  • Aquaculture of behemothic kelp

References [edit]

  1. ^ a b Isle of man, Thou.H. 1973. Seaweeds: their productivity and strategy for growth. Scientific discipline 182: 975-981.
  2. ^ See Fig. 3 in Blakemore, Robert (2018). "Non-Flat Earth Recalibrated for Terrain and Topsoil". Soil Systems. two (4): 64. doi:10.3390/soilsystems2040064.
  3. ^ a b Graham, Thou.H., B.P. Kinlan, Fifty.D. Druehl, L.E. Garske, and S. Banks. 2007. Deep-h2o kelp refugia equally potential hotspots of tropical marine diverseness and productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 16576-16580.
  4. ^ Darwin, C. 1909. The Voyage of the Beagle. The Harvard Classics Volume 29. New York, USA: P.F. Collier & Son Company.
  5. ^ Christie, H., Jørgensen, N.M., Norderhaug, K.Grand., Waage-Nielsen, E., 2003. Species distribution and habitat exploitation of animal associated with kelp (Laminaria hyperborea) forth the Norwegian coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 83, 687-699.
  6. ^ Jackson, Thousand.A. and C.D. Winant. 1983. Consequence of a kelp forest on coastal currents. Continental Shelf Report 2: 75-80.
  7. ^ a b c d e Steneck, R.Southward., M.H. Graham, B.J. Bourque, D. Corbett, J.K. Erlandson, J.A. Estes and Yard.J. Tegner. 2002. Kelp forest ecosystems: biodiversity, stability, resilience and time to come. Ecology Conservation 29: 436-459.
  8. ^ a b c d Sala, E., C.F. Bourdouresque and Thousand. Harmelin-Vivien. 1998. Line-fishing, trophic cascades, and the structure of algal assemblages: evaluation of an old but untested prototype. Oikos 82: 425-439.
  9. ^ a b c d eastward f g h Dayton, P.K. 1985a. Environmental of kelp communities. Almanac Review of Environmental and Systematics 16: 215-245.
  10. ^ Norderhaug, K.Thou., Christie, H., 2009. Body of water urchin grazing and kelp re-vegetation in the NE Atlantic. Marine Biology Research 5, 515-528
  11. ^ Morton, Adam; Cordell, Marni; Fanner, David; Brawl, Andy; Evershed, Nick. "The expressionless sea: Tasmania's underwater forests disappearing in our lifetime". the Guardian . Retrieved 2020-ten-22 .
  12. ^ Steinbauer, James. "What Volition It Take to Bring Back the Kelp Forest? - Bay Nature Magazine". Bay Nature . Retrieved 2020-10-22 .
  13. ^ Kelp forests provide habitat for a multifariousness of invertebrates, fish, marine mammals, and birds NOAA. Updated 11 January 2013. Retrieved 15 Jan 2014.
  14. ^ Jones, C.Chiliad., J. H. Lawton and Yard. Shachak. 1997. Positive and negative furnishings of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78: 1946-1957.
  15. ^ a b Druehl, Fifty.D. 1981. The distribution of Laminariales in the Due north Pacific with reference to environmental influences. Proceedings of the International Congress on Systematic Evolution and Biological science 2: 248-256.
  16. ^ Wheeler, West.N. 1980. Upshot of boundary layer ship on the fixation of carbon by the behemothic kelp Macrocystis pyrifera. Marine Biology 56: 103-110.
  17. ^ Steneck, R.Southward. and M.N. Dethier. 1994. A functional group approach to the structure of algal-dominated communities. Oikos 69: 476-498.
  18. ^ Joly, A.B. and E.C. Oliveira Filho. 1967. Two Brazilian Laminarias. Instituto de Pesquisas da Marinha 4: 1-seven.
  19. ^ Petrov, J.Eastward., Thousand.V. Suchovejeva and G.5. Avdejev. 1973. New species of the genus Laminaria from the Philippines Sea. Nov Sistem. Nizch. Rast. ten: 59-61.
  20. ^ Santelices, B. 2007. The discovery of kelp forests in deep-water habitats of tropical regions. Proceedings of the NationalAwan Riak Academy of Sciences 104: 19163-19164.
  21. ^ a b c Foster, M.Southward. and D.R. Schiel. 1985. The environmental of behemothic kelp forests in California: a community profile. Us Fish and Wildlife Service Report 85: one-152.
  22. ^ a b Graham, M.H. 2004. Furnishings of local deforestation on the diversity and structure of Southern California giant kelp forest nutrient webs. Ecosystems 7: 341-357.
  23. ^ Fowler-Walker, M.J., B. Thou. Gillanders, South.D. Connell and A.D. Irving. 2005. Patterns of clan betwixt canopy-morphology and understory assemblages beyond temperate Commonwealth of australia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Scientific discipline 63: 133-141.
  24. ^ Jackson, G.A. 1977. Nutrients and production of giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, off southern California. Limnology and Oceanography 22: 979-995.
  25. ^ a b Dayton, P.K. One thousand.J. Tegner, P.B. Edwards and K.L. Riser. 1999. Temporal and spatial scales of kelp demography: the role of the oceanographic climate. Ecological Monographs 69: 219-250.
  26. ^ a b Carr, 1000.H. 1994. Effects of macroalgal dynamics on recruitment of a temperate reef fish. Environmental 75: 1320-1333.
  27. ^ a b Estes, J.A. and D.O. Duggins. 1995. Bounding main otters and kelp forests in Alaska: generality and variation in a community ecological prototype. Ecological Monographs 65: 75-100.
  28. ^ a b c Pearse, J.South. and A.H. Hines. 1987. Expansion of a key California kelp wood following the mass mortality of sea urchins. Marine Biology 51: 83-91.
  29. ^ Scheibiling, R.Eastward. and A.Due west. Hennigar. 1997. Recurrent outbreaks of disease in sea urchins Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in Nova Scotia: evidence for a link with big-scale shooting star logic and oceanographic events. Marine Ecology Progress Series 152: 155-165.
  30. ^ Velimirov, B., J.G. Field, C.50. Griffiths and P. Zoutendyk. 1977. The ecology of kelp bed communities in the Benguela upwelling system. Helgoland Marine Research 30: 495-518.
  31. ^ Andrew, N.L. 1993. Spatial heterogeneity, sea urchin grazing, and habitat structure on reefs in temperate Australia. Ecology 74: 292-302.
  32. ^ Dayton, P.One thousand. 1985b. The structure and regulation of some South American kelp communities. Ecological Monographs 55: 447-468.
  33. ^ a b c Sala, Due east. and Thou.H. Graham. 2002. Community-wide distribution of predator-prey interaction strength in kelp forests. Proceedings of the National University of Sciences 99: 3678-3683.
  34. ^ Byrnes, J., J.J. Stachowicz, Yard.M. Hultgren, A.R. Hughes, S.V. Olyarnik and C.S. Thornber. 2006. Predator diversity strengthens trophic cascades in kelp forests by modifying herbivore behavior. Ecology Letters 9: 61-71.
  35. ^ a b Halpern, B.S., K. Cottenie and B.R. Broitman. 2006. Potent height-down control in Southern California kelp forest ecosystems. Scientific discipline 312: 1230-1232.
  36. ^ Lawrence, J.Yard. 1975. On the relationships betwixt marine plants and sea urchins. Oceanography and Marine Biology, An Almanac Review. 13: 213-286.
  37. ^ Hughes, T.P. 1994. Catastrophes, phase shifts and big-calibration degradation of a Caribbean coral reef. Science 265: 1547-1551.
  38. ^ Siversten, Thou. 2006. Overgrazing of kelp beds along the declension of Norway. Journal of Applied Phycology 18: 599-610.
  39. ^ a b c d e Dayton, P.Chiliad., Chiliad.J. Tegner, P.E. Parnell and P.B. Edwards. 1992. Temporal and spatial patterns of disturbance and recovery in a kelp woods community. Ecological Monographs 62: 421-445.
  40. ^ Pearse, J.S. 2006. Ecological office of majestic sea urchins. Science 314: 940-941.
  41. ^ Lafferty, Chiliad.D. 2004. Fishing for lobsters indirectly increases epidemics in sea urchins. Ecological Applications fourteen: 1566-1573.
  42. ^ a b Vásquez, J.A., J.M. Alonso Vega and A.H. Buschmann. 2006. Long term variability in the structure of kelp communities in northern Chile and the 1997-98 ENSO. Periodical of Applied Phycology 18: 505-519.
  43. ^ Cowen, R.Yard. 1983. The effect of sheephead (Semicossyphus pulcher) predation on cherry sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) populations: an experimental analysis. Oecologia 58: 249-255.
  44. ^ a b Ebeling, A.Westward., D.R. Laur and R.J. Rowley. 1985. Severe tempest disturbances and reversal of customs structure in a southern California kelp forest. Marine Biology 84: 287-294.
  45. ^ a b Dayton, P.G. and K.J. Tegner. 1984. Catastrophic storms, El Niño, and patch stability in a southern California kelp customs. Science 224: 283-285.
  46. ^ Harrold, C. and D.C. Reed. 1985. Food availability, bounding main urchin grazing and kelp forest customs structure. Ecology 66: 1160-1169.
  47. ^ Koop, K., R.C. Newell and M.I. Lucas. 1982. Biodegradation and carbon flow based on kelp (Ecklonia maxima) debris in a sandy embankment microcosm. Marine Ecology Progress Series 7: 315-326.
  48. ^ Bustamante, R.H., G.G. Co-operative and Due south. Eekhout. 1995. Maintenance of infrequent intertidal grazer biomass in South Africa: subsidy by subtidal kelps. Ecology 76: 2314-2329.
  49. ^ Kaehler, Southward., E.A. Pakhomov, R.Thou. Kalin and S. Davis. 2006. Trophic importance of kelp-derived suspended particulate matter in a through-catamenia sub-Antarctic system. Marine Ecology Progress Series 316: 17-22.
  50. ^ Grigg, R.W. and R.S. Kiwala. 1970. Some ecological furnishings of discharged wastes on marine life. California Department of Fish and Game 56: 145-155.
  51. ^ Stull, J.K. 1989. Contaminants in sediments about a major marine outfall: history, effects and future. OCEANS '89 Proceedings 2: 481-484.
  52. ^ N, W.J., D.Eastward. James and L.Yard. Jones. 1993. History of kelp beds (Macrocystis) in Orange and San Diego Counties, California. Hydrobiologia 260/261: 277-283.
  53. ^ Tegner, G.J., P.K. Dayton, P.B. Edwards, K.L. Riser, D.B. Chadwick, T.A. Dean and L. Deysher. 1995. Furnishings of a large sewage spill on a kelp woods customs: ending or disturbance? Marine Environmental Research 40: 181-224.
  54. ^ Carpenter, S.R., R.F. Caraco, D.F. Cornell, R.Westward. Howarth, A.N. Sharpley and Five.N. Smith. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications viii: 559-568.
  55. ^ Kennelly, South.J. 1987. Physical disturbances in an Australian kelp community. I. Temporal effects. Marine Ecology Progress Series forty: 145-153.
  56. ^ McPhaden, One thousand.J. 1999. Genesis and evolution of the 1997-1998 El Niño. Scientific discipline 283: 950-954.
  57. ^ Edwards, M.S. and G. Hernández-Carmona. 2005. Delayed recovery of giant kelp near its southern range limit in the Due north Pacific following El Niño. Marine Biology 147: 273-279.
  58. ^ Duggins, D.O., J.Eastward. Eckman and A.T. Sewell. 1990. Ecology of understory kelp environments. Two. Effects of kelps on recruitment of benthic invertebrates. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 143: 27-45.
  59. ^ a b Jackson, J.B.C, M.10. Kirby, Due west.H. Berger, Yard.A. Bjorndal, Fifty.Westward. Botsford, B.J. Bourque, R.H. Bradbury, R. Cooke, J. Erlandson, J.A. Estes, T.P. Hughes, Southward. Kidwell, C.B. Lange, H.Due south. Lenihan, J.M. Pandolfi, C.H. Peterson, R.Southward. Steneck, G.J. Tegner and R.R. Warner. 2002. Historical overfishing and the recent plummet of littoral ecosystems. Science 293: 629-638.
  60. ^ Irving, A.D. and Southward.D. Connell. 2006. Predicting understory structure from the presence and composition of canopies: an assembly rule for marine algae. Oecologia 148: 491-502.
  61. ^ Simenstad, C.A., J.A. Estes and Yard.Due west. Kenyon. 1978. Aleuts, sea otters, and alternate stable-state communities. Science 200: 403-411.
  62. ^ Pringle Did Humans Colonize the World by Boat?
  63. ^ Gutierrez, A., T. Correa, 5. Muñoz, A. Santibañez, R. Marcos, C. Cáceres and A.H. Buschmann. 2006. Farming of the giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera in southern Republic of chile for development of novel food products. Periodical of Applied Phycology 18: 259-267.
  64. ^ Ortiz, Chiliad. and Due west. Stotz. 2007. Ecological and eco-social models for the introduction of the abalone Haliotis discus hannai into benthic systems of due north-primal Republic of chile: sustainability assessment. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 17: 89-105.
  65. ^ Scheffer, Chiliad., S. Carpenter, J.A. Foley, C. Folke and B. Walter. 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413: 591-596.
  66. ^ MacDonald, Lucy (2019-02-06). "95pc of Tasmania's behemothic kelp is gone, scientists are in a race to save what's left". ABC News . Retrieved 2020-02-09 .
  67. ^ Frost, T.Yard., S.R. Carpenter, A.R. Ives, and T.K. Kratz. 1995. "Species compensation and complementarity in ecosystem part." In: C. Jones and J. Lawton, editors. Linking species and ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, London. 387pp.
  68. ^ Tilman, D., C.50. Lehman, and C.Due east. Bristow. 1998. Diversity-stability relationships: statistical inevitability or ecological consequence? The American Naturalist 151: 277-282.
  69. ^ Stachowicz, J.J., R.B. Whitlatch and R.W. Osman. 1999. Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem. Science 286: 1577-1579.
  70. ^ Elmqvist, T., C. Folke, Grand. Nyström, G. Peterson, J. Bengtsson, B. Walker and J. Norberg. 2003. Response diversity, ecosystem modify and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment i: 488-494.
  71. ^ "Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability". www.ipcc.ch . Retrieved 2022-02-28 .
  72. ^ Stekoll, One thousand.S., L.Eastward. Deysher and M. Hess. 2006. A remote sensing approach to estimating harvestable kelp biomass. Journal of Applied Phycology eighteen: 323-334.
  73. ^ Allison, 1000.A., J. Lubchenco and Grand.H. Carr. 1998. Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation. Ecological Applications viii: S79-S92.
  74. ^ Airamé, Due south., J.E. Dugan, K.D. Lafferty, H. Leslie, D.A. MacArdle and R.R. Warner. 2003. Applying ecological criteria to marine reserve design: a case written report from the California Channel Islands. Ecological Applications 13: S170-S184.
  75. ^ Bohnsack, J.A. 1998. Application of marine reserves to reef fisheries management. Australian Journal of Ecology 23: 298-304.
  76. ^ Gell, F.R. and C.M. Roberts. 2003. Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 448-455.
  77. ^ Willis, T.J., R.B. Millar and R.C. Babcock. 2003. Protection of exploited fish in temperate regions: high density and biomass of snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) in northern New Zealand marine reserves. Periodical of Practical Ecology twoscore: 214-227.
  78. ^ Paddack, G.J. and J.A. Estes. 2000. Kelp forest fish populations in marine reserves and adjacent exploited areas of Central California. Ecological Applications x: 855-870.
  79. ^ Rogers-Bennett, L. and J.South. Pearse. 2001. Indirect benefits of marine protected areas for juvenile abalone. Conservation Biology xv: 642-647.
  80. ^ Babcock, R.C., South. Kelly, Northward.T. Shears, J.W. Walker and T.J. Willis. 1999. Changes in customs structure in temperate marine reserves. Marine Environmental Progress Series 189: 125-134.
  81. ^ Halpern, B.S. and R.R. Warner. 2002. Marine reserves have rapid and lasting effects. Environmental Letters 5: 361-366.
  82. ^ "Hitting Rock Lesser: The Disappearance of California'due south Underwater Forests". The Nib Lane Center for the American West, Stanford University. 2021-03-18. Retrieved 2021-08-11 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  83. ^ Kerlin, Kat (2019-ten-21). "California'southward Crashing Kelp Forest". Scientific discipline and Climate . Retrieved 2021-08-11 .
  84. ^ Academy of California Santa Cruz (2021-03-05). "The collapse of Northern California kelp forests volition be difficult to opposite". phys.org . Retrieved 2021-08-11 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  85. ^ "5 Reasons to Protect Kelp, the West Coast'south Powerhouse Marine Algae". Pew Research Center. 2020-05-27. Retrieved 2021-08-11 . {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  86. ^ Foster, Michael South (2013). "Kelp Forests in California" (PDF). Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  87. ^ Williams, Jonathan P.; Claisse, Jeremy T.; Ii, Daniel J. Pondella; Williams, Chelsea M.; Robart, Matthew J.; Scholz, Zoe; Jaco, Erin Yard.; Ford, Tom; Burdick, Heather; Conscious, David (2021-04-15). "Sea urchin mass bloodshed rapidly restores kelp forest communities". Marine Ecology Progress Series. 664: 117–131. doi:ten.3354/meps13680. ISSN 0171-8630.
  88. ^ "New Findings on Kelp Forest Restoration". USC Ocean Grant - USC Dana and David Dornsife College of Messages, Arts and Sciences . Retrieved 2021-08-eleven . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-condition (link)
  89. ^ "Saving California's kelp forests". CNN . Retrieved 2021-08-11 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  90. ^ "New Written report Finds Hope for Restoration of Kelp Beds and Commercial Fisheries". PolyCentric. 2021-06-21. Retrieved 2021-08-11 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  91. ^ "Project: Palos Verdes". SeaTrees, past Sustainable Surf. 2021. Retrieved 2021-08-eleven . {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: url-condition (link)
  92. ^ Hohman, R (2019). "Sonoma-Mendocino Bull Kelp Recovery Plan, for Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary and California Department of Fish & Wild animals" (PDF). Greater Farallones Association . Retrieved 2021-08-eleven . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-condition (link)
  93. ^ "Marine Invasive Species - Aqueduct Islands National Park". U.S. National Park Service. 2017-04-17. Retrieved 2021-08-eleven . {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  94. ^ Ritchie, Erika I (2020-09-08). "An Orange County marine biologist wants to weed the body of water to help kelp grow". Orange Canton Register . Retrieved 2021-08-11 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-condition (link)
  95. ^ "Kelp: California'south Coastal Forests". Coastal and Marine Sciences Institute, UC Davis. 2021-01-12. Retrieved 2021-08-11 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  96. ^ "Kelp Reforestation Program". Orangish County Coastkeeper . Retrieved 2021-08-eleven .
  97. ^ "Kelp is on the Mode". Humboldt State Now. 2021-07-12. Retrieved 2021-08-11 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  98. ^ Leitzell, Katherine (2020-07-06). "New research to accost kelp forest crisis in California". California Sea Grant . Retrieved 2021-08-11 . {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  99. ^ Bittenbender, Steve (2021-08-10). "Huffman-sponsored nib seeks grant funding to restore kelp forests". SeafoodSource . Retrieved 2021-08-11 . {{cite spider web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)

External links [edit]

  • "Kelp Forest & Rocky Subtidal Habitats". noaa.gov. Archived from the original on 2007-03-22.
  • "Kelp Spotter". tas.gov.au. Tasmania, Australia: Department of Master Industries, Water & Surroundings. Archived from the original on 2004-12-04. Excellent general information on kelp forests, also as specific information on Tasmanian kelp forests.
  • "Monterey Bay Aquarium Kelp Cam". mbayaq.org. Monterey Bay Aquarium. Archived from the original on 1999-xi-28. Sentinel a live feed from the kelp forest exhibit.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelp_forest

Posted by: baggettvirs1976.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Animals Live In The Kelp Forest"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel